|
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
--- Public Statement
20 July 2001
AI Index ASA 36/005/2001 - News Service Nr. 126
Singapore:
International trial observer to attend Court of Appeal as former opposition
leader JB Jeyaretnam faces possible expulsion from parliament
A representative of Amnesty International and
Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada, Mr Howard Rubin, will attend two appeals
involving JB Jeyaretnam, former Secretary-General of the opposition Worker's
Party, due to be heard before Singapore's Court of Appeal in the week
commencing Monday 23 July 2001.
Amnesty
International and Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada are concerned that the
Singaporean government may be using libel laws in a manner that amounts to a
violation of the fundamental rights to freely hold and peacefully express one's
opinions. Such use of the libel laws
and the awarding of damages which are not clearly in proportion to the harm
suffered by the victim run the risk of having a serious chilling effect on
freedom of expression in Singapore. To many Singaporeans the libel suits
against JB Jeyaretnam and other government critics may act as a powerful
deterrent to exercising their right to peaceful freedom of expression.
One
appeal, relating to a bankruptcy order issued in January 2001 after JB
Jeyaretnam failed to pay an installment of libel damages awarded to the
organizing committee of a 1995 event promoting the Tamil language, may result
in JB Jeyaretnam being confirmed bankrupt and so automatically removed from
parliament and prevented from standing in future elections.
A
second appeal relates to the revival of libel suits filed by Senior Minister
Lee Kuan Yew and other senior members of the ruling People's Action Party (PAP)
for an allegedly defamatory statement made by JB Jeyaretnam during the 1997
election campaign. Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong was awarded S$100,000 damages
plus costs in 1998 because of this statement.
Amnesty
International and Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada are concerned that a number of
defamation suits against opposition members and perceived government critics,
resulting in large damage awards, may have failed to achieve the requisite
balance between protection of reputation and protection of freedom of expression
and as such may be inconsistent with international norms protecting the
fundamental right of freedom of expression.
The
representative of Amnesty International and Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada will
attend these appeal proceedings in order to assess respect for international
norms and will reprot directly back to Amnesty International and Lawyers'
Rights Watch Canada. The trial observation will form one part of the
organizations' ongoing investigations into alleged violations of the right to freedom
of expression in Singapore.
Background information:
JB Jeyaretnam
JB Jeyaretnam, 75, a former Senior District
Judge, was elected as Secretary-General of the Workers' Party in 1971. In 1981
he won a by-election becoming the first opposition member in over fifteen years
to sit in parliament with PAP parliamentarians. Following his re-election in
1984, J B Jeyaretnam was charged for alleged financial impropriety related to
the collection of party funds. In 1986 he was acquitted by a District Court of
all charges save one. The prosecution appealed the acquittal and the then Chief
Justice allowed the appeal, with the direction that a re-trial be heard by a
District Court. At re-trial JB Jeyaretnam was found guilty and sentenced to
three months in jail, which was reduced by the High Court but with the addition
of a S$5,000 fine. The imposition of a fine of over S$2,000 resulted in the
automatic disqualification of JB Jeyaretnam as a member of parliament and the
conviction also triggered a Law Society hearing that resulted in him being
disbarred.
JB
Jeyaretnam's earlier application for the re-trial to be heard before the High
Court rather than a District Court, which would have allowed any subsequent
appeal to be pursued up to Singapore's then highest court, the Privy Council
located in London, had been refused.
After his conviction his appeal to the Privy Council was limited to
consideration of his disbarment. In its judgement the Privy Council concluded
that JB Jeyaretnam and a co-accused had been "fined, imprisoned, and
publicly disgraced for offences for which they were not guilty" and directed
the Law Society to reinstate JB Jeyaretnam.
The government refused to heed the Privy Council's advice to facilitate
a pardon for JB Jeyaretnam on the grounds that the criminal convictions had not
been the subject of the Privy Council appeal. JB Jeyaretnam was subsequently
re-instated as a lawyer, but prevented from standing again for election until
1997, when he ran and was returned as a non-constituency member of
parliament.
The Appeals:
1) JB Jeyaretnam vs. Lee Kuan Yew et al
Shortly after the 1997 election Senior Minister
Lee Kuan Yew, Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong and other senior PAP members filed
suits against JB Jeyaretnam alleging that he had defamed them at an election
rally by saying the words "And finally, Mr Tang Liang Hong has just placed
before me two reports he has made to the police against, you know, Mr Goh Chok
Tong and his people".
Tang
Liang Hong, a Workers' Party parliamentary candidate, had filed a police report
alleging that the PAP leadership had defamed him during the campaign by
publicly labeling him an "anti-Christian, Chinese chauvinist". The PAP leaders listed in the police
reports, alleging that they had been defamed by Tang Liang Hong through the
reports, sued and were awarded damages of S$8.08 million (US$5.6 million)
reduced on appeal to S$4.53 million (US$ 2.3 million). Tang Liang Hong was
subsequently declared bankrupt.
In
his suit against JB Jeyaretnam, Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong was awarded
S$20,000 increased on his appeal to S$100,000 plus full costs. Amnesty
International representatives observed both trial and appeal and expressed
concerns that the suits against JB Jeyaretnam were politically motivated. In 1998 Goh Chok Tong began bankruptcy
proceedings against JB Jeyaretnam but later agreed to accept payment of the
damages awarded to him in installments. Bankruptcy proceedings resumed when JB
Jeyaretnam failed to meet an installment but the Prime Minister discontinued
them with S$31,000 remaining unpaid. In
December 2000, Goh Chok Tong's co-plaintiffs including Lee Kuan Yew and other
PAP members, took steps to revive their 1997 suits which had not yet come
before the courts. It is the dismissal
of JB Jeyaretnam's application to dismiss these libel actions for failure to
proceed for a period of over three years that is the subject of the appeal
before the Court of Appeal in July 2001.
2) JB Jeyaretnam vs. Indra Krishnan et
al (the ‘Tamil Language Week'
case)
A 1995
article in the Workers' Party newspaper alleged that an event called the ‘Tamil
Language Week' was an ineffective means of advancing the Tamil language and
that a number of those involved were political opportunists beholden to the
government. The article resulted in two
parallel libel suits against the author of the article, JB Jeyaretnam as editor
and members of the Workers' Party party's central committee.
In
the first suit, involving Minister of Foreign Affairs S Jayakumar and four
other PAP parliamentarians, the defendants agreed to apologize publicly and to
pay S$200,000 in damages. In February 1998, after paying S$100,000 in three
installments, the defendants were unable to make further payments and the
plaintiffs did not pursue the matter at that time.
The second suit was lodged by Indra Krishnan
and 9 other members of the 'Tamil Language Week' organizing committee, one of
whom is now a PAP Member of Parliament. Although the author admitted that he
was wholly responsible for the article, the High Court awarded the plaintiffs
S$265,000 damages and S$250,000 costs jointly against all the defendants. Two
of the plaintiffs subsequently began bankruptcy proceedings against JB
Jeyaretnam alone, but were paid off in installments. Subsequently the other eight plaintiffs also began bankruptcy
proceedings against JB Jeyaretnam, and one day after JB Jeyaretnam failed to
pay an agreed installment in January 2001, he was declared bankrupt. On 16 July
2001 JB Jeyaretnam offered to pay off the remaining damages in three further
installments. JB Jeyaretnam's final appeal against this bankruptcy order will
be heard before the Court of Appeal between 22-27 July 2001. If JB Jeyaretnam
is confirmed bankrupt he will be automatically removed from parliament.
Amnesty
International has learned that a contributory factor in JB Jeyaretnam's failure
to pay the agreed installment to Indra Krishnan and her fellow plaintiffs by
one day in January 2001 was the unexpected petition by Minister of Foreign
Affairs S Jayakumar and the 4 other PAP plaintiffs. After making no demands
since receiving a third installment towards their S$200,000 award in 1998,
these plaintiffs applied successfully to the courts in December 2000 to seize a
sum of S$66,600 awarded to JB Jeyaretnam that month against a lawyer who owed
him costs. JB Jeyaretnam had reportedly intended to use that money to meet his
agreed January repayment. The Minister of Foreign Affairs and his fellow
plaintiffs pursued the balance of payments of their damages award against
Jeyaretnam alone and not against the other Workers' Party defendants.
For further information please see the
following documents on www.amnesty.org
Singapore: JB Jeyaretnam - Defamation suits
assault freedom of expression (AI Index: ASA 36/05/98) 22 July 1998.
Singapore: JB Jeyaretnam - the use of
defamation suits for political purposes (AI Index: ASA 36/04/97) 15 October
1997.
public document
****************************************
For more information please call Amnesty International's press
office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566
Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW web : http://www.amnesty.org
Last updated : July 20
|