June
5, 2001, 2:00 pm. Organizmo Judicial de Guatemala, Jolanda Pérez,
Presidente
11. Jolanda Pérez is a Magistrate of the Court of Appeal and is
also the President of the Judges Association of Guatemala (Organizmo
Judicial).
12. I gave a brief introduction of LRWC and the IDC to Judge Pérez
and explained to her that I was in Guatemala to observe the Gerardi
trial and to support not only the lawyers involved but also the
Judges. I told her that we were aware of the fact that a number of
Judges who had been involved in the case had been the subject of
threats and that we knew at least one Judge had fled the country.
13. Judge Pérez welcomed me to Guatemala and “joked” that in
general things had improved from complete chaos to the current state
of crisis. She said that for Judges in Guatemala life was both
difficult and complicated and that the threats against Judges had
become worse over the past year than they had been in preceding
years. She mentioned the seven assassinations of lawyers between
October, 2000 and February of this year and noted that the in the
same time period there had been over fifty (50) threats levied
against Judges alone. The threats had included a number of
assassination attempts. She also mentioned the lynching of
Judge Martinez in the remote locale of Senahú where a local mob,
unhappy with one of his decisions, had thrown boulders through the
roof of his house until they killed him (see meeting with Leopoldo
Liu below for more details).
14. She noted that there were numerous threats to the
independence of Judges in Guatemala and the threats and pressures
could come from numerous sectors including: organized crime,
the private sector, the Public Ministry and public officials, the
military, and even the Government Office of Human Rights. She
noted that in the interior of the country, the Human Rights Office
had been responsible for inciting people against Judges based on
making unpopular decisions. She noted that if the Public
Ministry was not happy with a Judge’s decision that quite often
the Ministry would lodge a complaint with the Judicial Disciplinary
Committee accusing the Judge of complicity with the accused.
15. Judge Pérez said that the government was largely indifferent
to the threats against Judges and that there has not been a single
official government pronouncement against the ongoing threats, even
when the Judge was lynched in Senahú. She said that in her
opinion there appears to be what amounts to an intentional policy to
reduce the legitimacy of the Judiciary. She said that while
the government had created a new office whose mandate was to
investigate threats, attacks, and assassinations against people
operating in the justice system including judges, lawyers and
others, that at this point there were no results of these
investigations. In her opinion it was largely a decorative office.
My later meeting with the director of this office (see below)
confirmed her view.
16. Judge Pérez expressed her frustration in having to
work under these conditions and with continual threats to judicial
independence. She said that not only do judges in Guatemala
face physical lynching but they also face ongoing social lynching as
well. She noted that in Guatemala there is a general lack of
legal culture following thirty -six (36) years of war and
lawlessness. There is no ability to rebuild the legal culture
especially when certain sectors exist that do not want the rule of
law to prevail.
17. She noted that the Judges Association had recently struck a
security committee, but that they had few resources to do very much.
Their hope was to increase communication with judges located in the
interior so as to avoid the type of situation, which happened in
Senahú. The Association is also planning courses on personal
security and is also hoping to run courses for a new police force,
which will act as guards within the judicial system. She noted
that Judges have no health insurance and no life insurance.
18. She said that the Judges had been encouraged by the visit of
the UN Special Rapporteur for Judicial Independence Param
Cumaraswamy and that Cumaraswamy had asked to speak with the
President of Guatemala immediately following the assassination of
the Judge in Senahú.
19. She felt that Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada could contribute
immediately by writing letters in support of the security of Judges.
I feel that this is especially important in light of the threats,
which have been made against the Judges in the Gerardi case
following their decision, including the appearance of a military
helicopter taking pictures of Judge Jasmin Barrios’s house.
20. Judge Pérez noted that some kind of a judicial exchange
could be very interesting especially as in her view, Guatemala
represents a kind of small laboratory for viewing all of the
problems facing democracy and for examining the fragility of
democracy. She has written an article for Judges in Spain
entitled “What it is to a be a Judge in Guatemala” which
motivated the Spanish Judges to speak out in solidarity with the
Judges in Guatemala. She will be e-mailing us this article.
21. Interestingly the next day the Guatemalan newspaper El Periòdico
ran an article featuring Judge Pérez and announcing the creation of
an elite team to guard the security of threatened Judges. The
elite security team will be composed of civilians who will be
trained in providing security. Judge Pérez expressed little
optimism that the creation of the security force was going to take
care of the ongoing threats to Judges. She felt that it would
be more important to put resources into finding out where the
threats come from and capturing those that are issuing such threats
and not allowing these people to continue to threaten the Judicial
system with impunity. The creation of the elite force was
announced by the Supreme Court of Guatemala and was one of the
recommendations in the report of the UN Special Rapporteur
Cumaraswamy.
June 7, 2001 7:00 am Faculty of Law at the University of San
Carlos
22. I met with the Director of the Faculty of Law, Carlos
Estuardo Gàlvez Barrios and the Academic Co-ordinator Juan Herberto
Martinez. The school is the largest law school in Guatemala and San
Carlos is the state funded University in Guatemala. The law school
takes in approximately three thousand students a year and has two
hundred and fifty (250) professors. The school graduates
approximately three hundred (300) students each year. Most
practicing lawyers in Guatemala are graduates of the University of
San Carlos Law School.